Web Writing + AI Search Training
Shared standards for useful, accessible, findable Case Western Reserve University pages.
CWRU web, content, communications, and marketing teams
Clearer pages that serve people first and AI interpretation second


What we will cover
The deck starts with decisions content owners can make now, then shows how those same choices support AI search.
Purpose, audience intent, skimmability, headings, CTAs, and page structure.
Readable links, headings, lists, tables, and alt text judgment.
CWRU examples from program, giving, research, and newsroom pages.
LLMs, grounding, entities, semantic clarity, citations, and measurement.
Prioritize fixes, owners, reusable rules, and open questions.
How this training will work
Each section starts with a practical decision CWRU teams can use immediately.
CWRU screenshots keep the standards concrete and easy to apply.
Participants will diagnose, rewrite, compare, and name reusable rules.
Policy, platform, governance, and ownership questions get separated from quick content edits.
Four ways we will judge page quality
Every example gets tested by what it does for visitors, accessibility, search systems, and ongoing ownership.
Can a real visitor understand the page quickly enough to keep moving?
Do headings, links, image choices, lists, and tables reduce friction?
Can search and AI systems identify the facts, entities, and relationships?
Which fixes belong to content owners, and which need platform, policy, or brand decisions?
Day 1 leads into Day 2
Focus on scanning, comprehension, trust, calls to action, and accessible page structure.
Use the same clarity to support search engines, AI systems, entities, citations, and measurement.
Day 1 agenda
What you should leave with
A shared page quality framework you can use immediately.
A practical explanation of why AI search changes visibility, not the need for clear pages.
Before/after patterns for CWRU program, giving, research, and newsroom content.
A short list of priority changes CWRU can standardize after the training.
Web writing foundations before the AI layer
People, purpose, structure, accessibility, and live CWRU page work
How we will use page examples together
This previews the review method we will use when the live CWRU examples begin.
What should this page help a visitor understand, decide, or do?
Scan the headings, links, calls to action, and proof before judging the body copy.
Turn each example into a rule Case Western Reserve teams can reuse on other pages.
Separate quick copy edits from brand, CMS, policy, and approval questions.
How visitors decide what to read
Headings, links, and buttons tell visitors whether the page is worth reading.
Prospective students, parents, faculty, and partners each need different signals.
Program names, outcomes, requirements, dates, and contacts should be easy to find.
Every page should make the next useful action obvious.
Reader behavior and page jobs
Start with how people move through pages, then define what each page needs to accomplish.
Skimmers, swimmers, and divers
Different people consume content in different ways, and the same person may shift depth depending on where they are in research and decision.
Read headings, bullets, and key stats, then decide whether the page is worth their time.
Give them precise H1/H2 language, short summaries, lists, and visible CTAs.
Fast orientationRead some supporting copy, watch a video if it helps, and click into a related page.
Give them proof points, useful links, accordions, and sections that keep rewarding attention.
Selective explorationRead the full page and move deeper into requirements, catalogs, research, deadlines, or downloads.
Give them detailed evidence, clean internal links, course or program depth, and clear ownership.
Deep confidenceSource: Search Influence, "Skimmers, Swimmers, and Divers: Content Strategy for Higher Education Websites"
The web page is still the source of record
CWRU pages remain the public source that people, search engines, and grounded AI systems can inspect.
AI search makes clear public pages more important, not less important.
The goal is not more output; it is better discernment about what belongs on each page.
Useful page standard
A useful page answers a real reader question.
It gives the reader enough evidence to keep moving.
It makes the next step easy to understand and choose.
It gives search and AI systems the facts and relationships they need.
Page job statement
Use this before editing copy. If the sentence is hard to finish, the page is probably trying to do too many jobs.
This moves the group from opinion based editing to standards based editing.
Mini exercise: page job statement
Write a one sentence job statement for one CWRU page.
7 minutes
Reader intent vs. institutional habit
Most page friction starts when the institution writes from its process instead of the reader's decision.
Readers usually want
Institutions often publish
CWRU pages we will test today
Use real CWRU pages to move from page job assumptions into shared review. Ren sets the working assumptions for the group.
Top of funnel undergraduate exploration.
Complex graduate program with multiple specialties and application paths.
Graduate/professional program with strong conversion needs.
Action page that needs clarity, confidence, and motivation.
School level authority hubs for Day 2 entity work.
Institutional reputation and external signal examples for Day 2.
Page jobs for CWRU examples
Use the same sentence pattern across different page types, then test whether the page actually supports that job.
Prospective undergraduates and families need to understand what engineering at CWRU looks like.
Explore programs, hands on opportunities, and admission next steps.
Does every major section support exploration, confidence, or action?
Graduate nursing applicants need to understand MSN paths, specialties, requirements, and deadlines.
Choose a fit and start an application or inquiry.
Does the page reduce specialty confusion before adding detail?
Social work applicants need the on campus MSW format, outcomes, requirements, and admissions process.
Request information or apply.
Does the page answer fit and next step before institutional background?
Donors need to choose a giving method and understand why CWRU is worth supporting.
Complete the gift confidently.
Does the page offer transaction clarity and donor confidence?
Headings, language, and calls to action
Turn page diagnosis into reusable writing rules participants can apply after the session.
Heading audit: reader path and machine signal
Headings should let a skimmer understand the page path and help search and AI systems identify useful content chunks.
Use one clear H1 tied to the page job, then move from orientation to decision to action.
List the current H1/H2s, check audience fit, check flow, then fix headings before rewriting paragraphs.
Make H2s answer real reader questions and name the topic, audience, and decision in plain language.
Clear headings create sections that search engines and AI systems can understand, retrieve, and cite.
Better H2 questions for program pages
What can I study here?
Who is this program for?
What will I be prepared to do?
What makes CWRU's version distinctive?
What are the requirements, deadlines, and next steps?
Plain language without flattening expertise
Use precise institutional language where it matters.
Remove internal phrasing that only staff understand.
Prefer direct verbs and specific nouns.
Do not make expert content vague in the name of simplicity.
Exercise: heading only page read
Read only the H1/H2s. What do you know, and what is still unclear?
10 minutes
CTA clarity
- Learn more
- Click here
- More information
- Multiple equal CTAs competing for attention
- Request information about the MSN program
- Start your application
- Explore engineering majors
- Make a gift online
CTA placement rule
Put the next action near the decision point.
Use the CTA to complete the reader's current task, not the institution's internal funnel label.
If a page has multiple audiences, label the paths clearly.
Do not make readers infer the destination from surrounding copy.
Exercise: CTA rewrite
Make one CTA more specific without making it pushy.
8 minutes
Content accessibility
Practical editorial decisions, not a compliance lecture
Accessibility scope for this training
Focus on content decisions CWRU teams can control.
Clear link text, useful alt text, meaningful headings, readable tables, and lists.
Name contrast, font size, and readability questions, then capture technical issues separately.
Accessibility, usability, and AI readable clarity often improve together.
Alt text judgment
Alt text is a judgment call. Start with what the image is doing on this page.
If yes, name the meaningful content in plain language.
If no, leave alt text empty.
If a caption or body copy already says it, do not make screen reader users hear it twice.
Name the destination or action, not just the visual object.
Useful, contextual description helps accessibility and content discovery. Keyword stuffing does neither.
When alt text should be empty
Decorative image that adds no information.
Visual flourish already described in nearby text.
Icon with adjacent visible label.
Avoid forcing screen reader users through irrelevant image details.
When alt text needs more detail
Image conveys unique information.
Chart or infographic includes data not otherwise available.
Photo identifies specific people, places, or moments relevant to the page.
Image is also a link or action trigger.
Link text rule
A link should make sense when it is read on its own.
Learn more
Click here
More information
Apply now
Explore engineering majors
Request information about the MSN program
Review MSW admission requirements
Make a gift online
If five links on the page say the same thing, rewrite them so each destination is clear.
Tables and lists
Use lists for grouped items that do not need row/column relationships.
Use tables only when comparison or data structure matters.
Name columns clearly.
Do not use tables for layout.
Accessibility quick audit
Find three content accessibility improvements on a selected CWRU page.
12 minutes
Live page review workshop
Apply the standards to real CWRU pages
Live review method
Review what the page currently communicates before jumping to fixes.
What is the page job?
What is the first point where a visitor may slow down or hesitate?
Separate copy fixes, design/CMS issues, and governance questions.
Turn the example into a recommended pattern CWRU can reuse.
Page quality framework
Use the same five checks on every page: who it serves, what they need, what proves it, what comes next, and what the page teaches search and AI systems.
The primary reader. Be specific: applicant, parent, donor, faculty peer.
The decision, concern, or comparison they brought to the page.
The proof that builds confidence: outcomes, dates, names, examples.
The next useful step: apply, compare, contact, give, read, visit.
What people, search engines, and AI systems should understand and repeat.
Do not start by rewriting. First diagnose the page against the same sequence: audience, question, evidence, action, signal.
Engineering page review
Broad exploratory audience. The hero clearly labels Engineering, but the next useful question is student fit and opportunity.
Add a summary block: what students can study, how they learn, and where to go next.
What can a prospective student decide from this view before scrolling deeper?
Engineering at CWRU combines research, design, and hands on problem solving from year one.
Follow along: https://case.edu/admission/academics/areas-study/engineering

MSN page review
Nurses are comparing specialties and application paths. Rich content can still overwhelm skimmers.
Add a decision oriented overview and a clear way to compare MSN options before specialty detail.
What does an applicant need before choosing a specialty?
Use Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Master of Science in Nursing, and nurse practitioner specialties consistently.
Follow along: https://case.edu/nursing/programs/msn

MSW page review
Strong conversion architecture, but the top of page can answer fit, format, outcome, and next step faster.
Add an opening block with format, location, audience, professional outcome, and admissions path.
Where could the page answer, Is this the right MSW path for me?
Make the next step explicit: request information about the on campus MSW.
Follow along: https://case.edu/programs/socialwork-msw-on campus

Ways to Give page review
The giving methods are visible, but the page can do more to build donor confidence and motivation.
Pair transaction options with impact context, support details, descriptive links, and a why-give path.
Is the giving method list enough for a donor to act confidently?
AI/search is secondary here. This is mainly UX writing, accessibility, and donor confidence.
Follow along: https://case.edu/give/ways-give

Day 1 close
Useful pages begin with purpose.
Structure is not cosmetic; it changes comprehension.
Accessibility, usability, and findability overlap.
The same clarity carries into Day 2, but AI systems interpret it through different mechanisms.
AI search, semantic clarity, and stronger signals
Connect yesterday's web writing standards to how CWRU is understood across search, AI, and trusted sources.
Q&A
Start with the questions from Day 1 before moving into AI search mechanics.
10 minutes
Day 2 agenda
What carries forward into AI search
Yesterday was about human comprehension.
Today is about how that same clarity becomes machine readable signal.
AI search does not eliminate SEO or web writing standards.
It raises the cost of vague, inconsistent, disconnected content.
AI search fundamentals
Clarify what changes in AI assisted discovery before moving into entities, citations, and measurement.
LLMs are not search engines
Retrieve and rank documents.
Generate answers from learned patterns and/or retrieved sources.
May cite sources when the system retrieves supporting material.
Make the facts, entities, relationships, and evidence clear enough to be retrieved, understood, and corroborated.
Search engine vs. large language model
The work changes depending on whether the system is retrieving pages, generating language, or doing both.
Find and store public pages.
Match documents to a query and order results.
Write an answer from model context and learned patterns.
Blend generation with retrieved pages and citations.
How are AI answers sourced?
Not every AI answer has the same source path. The grounded layer is the most actionable short term opportunity for CWRU.
Generated from learned patterns. Citation may be absent or weak.
The system checks external pages before answering.
The answer points to pages it can use as support.
And Google AI Overviews?
Think of AI Overviews as retrieval plus generation, not one or the other.

Google starts with pages it can crawl, understand, and evaluate.
The AI answer compresses the selected signals into a readable summary.
Visible sources tend to be pages with clear structure, evidence, and relevance.
So what's different between SEO and AI SEO?
Keywords still matter, but alone they are not enough.
Entities, relationships, and citations become more important.
Pages need clearer chunks and facts.
External corroboration matters because AI systems recognize patterns across sources.
AI authority is a probability game
The 3 pillars of SEO for AI search
Help AI recognize your brand, programs, and thought leaders as distinct, connected things, using clear, consistent language.
Optimize for meaning-rich content that reflects how real people search: answer questions, connect topics, and add context.
Build trust through mentions and references from authoritative sources like local and national media, social media, "best of" lists, and industry sites.
AI use has become mainstream
How frequently do you use AI-powered tools (such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Gemini) to search for information online? (n=760)
Source: AI Search in Higher Education: How Prospects Search in 2025, UPCEA & Search Influence
Where do they go for program info?
Prospects still use search engines and university websites, but AI tools are now part of the same discovery journey.
CWRU pages have to work for search, site visitors, and AI assisted discovery at the same time.

Source: AI Search in Higher Education: How Prospects Search in 2025, UPCEA & Search Influence
Do they read AI Overviews & trust mentioned brands?
Students do read AI OverviewsAnswer visibility matters
Mentioned brands earn more trustCitation quality mattersThe institution that appears in the answer gets an early credibility advantage before someone reaches the website.
Source: AI Search in Higher Education: How Prospects Search in 2025, UPCEA & Search Influence
Visibility is your competitive advantage
67%of learners start with three schools or fewerSource: EducationDynamics Modern Learner Report 2025Without SEO, you don't show up in AI

Entities and semantic clarity
Make the relationship between CWRU and its priority concepts unmistakable
What is an entity?
A named person, place, organization, program, topic, credential, or concept.
Case Western Reserve University, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Master of Science in Nursing, Cleveland, AAU, research expenditures.
AI systems use entities and relationships to infer what content is about.
CWRU entity map
AI readable clarity comes from naming the relationships, not just listing terms.
School of Medicine, Case School of Engineering, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Mandel School.
MSN, MSW, engineering areas of study.
Research growth, biomedical innovation, hands on engineering, professional education.
Cleveland, Ohio, AAU.
Rankings, accreditation, faculty expertise, outcomes, gifts, and external coverage.
Semantic triples
Use the triple as an editing tool. The audience does not need to see the jargon.
Case Western Reserve University
offers undergraduate engineering programs connected to
research, hands on design, and student outcomes
A clear defining sentence gives readers a fast answer and gives AI systems a cleaner sentence to quote or summarize.
Program boilerplate pattern
Good boilerplate is not filler. It is reusable entity language for program pages, newsroom context, social copy, and PR talking points.
Keep the language factual and consistent. Do not make every page invent a new description.
Semantic boilerplate examples
The same pattern adapts by page type without losing the named entities.
Case Western Reserve University offers undergraduate engineering programs for students who want hands on design, research, entrepreneurship, and technical problem solving in Cleveland.
Use: area-of-study, admissions, research, and news contexts.
Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing at Case Western Reserve University offers Master of Science in Nursing pathways and specialties for nurses preparing for advanced clinical, leadership, and specialty roles.
Use: program detail, school reputation, and applicant outcomes.
Case Western Reserve University's on campus Master of Social Work prepares students for social work practice through graduate study, field education, and community connected learning.
Use: audience, credential, format, and outcome.
Case Western Reserve University's giving options help alumni, friends, and partners support students, research, faculty, programs, and institutional priorities.
Use: transaction paths, impact, and authority signals.
Content chunks AI can retrieve
Definition or plain language summary.
Program or page facts.
Eligibility/requirements/deadlines.
Outcomes and proof.
FAQs or decision support sections.
Internal links to authoritative related pages.
Exercise: entity mapping
What should this page make unmistakably clear to AI systems?
12 minutes
CWRU entity example: School of Medicine
School level hub that should connect education, research, clinical expertise, people, and news.
School, degrees, departments, faculty, clinical partners, research themes, locations, rankings, and news.
What should AI understand about this school after reading only the top level page?
Source: https://case.edu/medicine/

CWRU entity example: Medicine Research
Research hub as institutional authority signal.
Research themes, faculty, centers, institutes, grants, partners, diseases, technologies, programs, and news.
Which topics should this page make CWRU known for?
Source: https://case.edu/medicine/research

CWRU entity example: Engineering Research
Research hub with clear authority and internal link potential.
Departments, centers, institutes, labs, research themes, faculty, industry partners, student experiences, and outcomes.
Design and CMS dependencies should be captured separately from content edits.
Source: https://case.edu/engineering/research

Newsroom and external signals
Your newsroom and outside coverage tell AI what CWRU is known for.
Your newsroom is an AI search asset.
Newsroom stories teach AI what CWRU is known for by connecting people, research, gifts, rankings, and momentum in one place.
Newsroom stories become source material for external coverage.
Newsroom stories corroborate what program and school pages claim.
Newsroom stories give AI repeated patterns around what CWRU is known for.
Newsroom language should connect the dots
Name the institution consistently.
Name the school, department, faculty, program, topic, and partner when relevant.
Explain why the story matters to audiences beyond campus.
Use consistent boilerplate so the right facts travel with every excerpt.
External corroboration
A claim gets stronger every time a credible source repeats it.
A CWRU page says what CWRU says about itself.
External pickup says other sources recognize or repeat the claim.
AI systems trust facts they see repeated across credible sources.
This is why PR, newsroom, and SEO should not be separated in the AI search conversation.
The next two slides show this with one real CWRU story.
Official story: fastest growing AAU research university
Official source for institutional authority.
CWRU frames itself as the #1 fastest growing research university in the AAU.
Connect this claim to school research pages, faculty expertise, graduate programs, and external pickup.
Source: https://case.edu/news/cwru-now-1-fastest-growing-research-university-aau

External pickup: Ohio Tech News
Same claim, now on a third-party site. That's corroboration.
Official CWRU story becomes third party sector coverage.
This is a concrete example of external corroboration.
Track which phrases, facts, and entity links from CWRU's original story made it into external coverage.
Consistent source language helps external coverage reinforce the same institutional signals.
Source: Ohio Tech News coverage of CWRU research growth story

External distribution example: EurekAlert
Distribution surfaces carry your boilerplate to places you don't control.
External distribution and institutional boilerplate.
Even when a page blocks text extraction, distribution surfaces still shape press release pickup.
Every release should carry clean entity language about CWRU, the people, the school, and the story.
Source: https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1126599

PR and media best practices for AI search
Say the same things, the same way, everywhere.
Consistent verbiage used in each release or talking points about the university, program, or priority topic.
Use the same factual description across newsroom, program page, social, and external pitch materials.
Include the institution, school, program, people, location, topic, credential, audience, and outcome.
Use outside coverage to corroborate the claims CWRU wants AI systems and prospects to remember.
This is how you go from saying something about CWRU to CWRU being known for it.
Supportive and derivative content
LinkedIn posts and articles can reinforce program, faculty, and newsroom language.
Video transcripts, interviews, podcasts, and webinars create another AI readable expert surface.
Faculty profiles and contributed pieces can carry expert language back to program, research, and newsroom pages.
The point is not volume; the point is consistent, useful, corroborated signals.
How to address inaccurate AI answers
Treat a wrong AI answer like a source tracing exercise, not a mystery.
Capture the pages or claims the tool points to.
Google the claim and search CWRU's own site.
Update outdated, vague, or conflicting source pages first.
Use newsroom, PR, and trusted sources to repeat the corrected signal.
Tools and measurement
Use tools to find gaps, not to outsource judgment
Tool categories to consider
AI visibility tools
Technical/site quality crawlers
Accessibility and content quality tools
SEO research platforms
Brand/reputation monitoring
Approved internal AI access, if available
Measurement caveat
AI visibility tools are directional.
One platform is not the whole truth.
Prompt wording changes results.
Use tools to find page priorities and citation gaps, then apply editorial judgment.
GA4 AI referral traffic
Use GA4 to see whether AI referred visitors are showing up, where they land, and whether they behave like qualified visitors.

Segment sessions from ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and other AI referrers.
Look for landing pages that already earn visits from AI citations and mentions.
Trend the sessions over time, but treat the number as directional.
Compare engagement, next page, and session quality against other channels.
Google Search Console question queries
Question queries show what people ask before they reach the page. Use them to fix headings, sections, and FAQs.

Filter Search Console for question language, then sort by impressions to find demand you already have.
(?i).*\b(what|why|who|how|where|when|which|whom|whose|can|could|should|would|is|are|was|were|do|does|did)\b.*Prompt visibility checks
Prompt around priority audiences and real decision moments.
Record whether CWRU is mentioned, cited, absent, or misrepresented.
Capture the sources AI uses.
Turn findings into page edits, citations, or newsroom/PR priorities.
Using tools without losing judgment
The tool should support the content decision, not become the focus.
Use a focused CWRU prompt cluster and one page example at a time.
Compare results, cited sources, missing entities, and recommended page actions.
Keep the work focused on findings and next actions.
Content optimizations by page type
AI search, SEO, and UX patterns for program, school, research, giving, and newsroom pages.
Five habits of stronger web content
Write for skimmers first, then add enough specificity for search systems, AI answers, and deeper readers to trust the page.
Program pages: make fit obvious fast
The clearest patterns are the gaps that appear across all three program pages.
Add a clean opening definition, a short FAQ, and question style headers before chasing one off page rewrites.
Crafting a program page
"Case Western Reserve University's undergraduate engineering programs consistently rank among the nation's best. Think, design and create like a bona fide engineer right out of the gate."
"The Case School of Engineering at Case Western Reserve University offers undergraduate degrees across 15 fields for students who want hands on research from year one."
Why it works: school, degrees, audience, and differentiator appear in one sentence.
Use the same fact pattern across program pages so readers and AI systems can compare pages quickly.
Example page: case.edu/admission/academics/areas-study/engineering
School homepages: connect identity, proof, and paths
Tie the school to Case Western Reserve in the first line before broader mission language.
Degrees, hospital partners, accreditation, founding year, and location.
Cover program, clinical, research, admissions, and location questions.
Show apply, request information, visit, program finder, and contact paths clearly.
Name accreditors and partner institutions in body copy, not only in sidebars.
Use one concise title and a search summary that names degrees and partners.
Crafting a school homepage
School of Medicine | School of Medicine | Case Western Reserve University
School of Medicine | Case Western Reserve University
Summary: The Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine offers MD, PhD, MS, and MPH programs, with clinical training across Cleveland's leading hospitals.
Example page: case.edu/medicine
Research pages: name the work and who it serves
Name the school, university, and actual research areas in the opening.
Cover research areas, undergraduate research, centers, funding, and partnership paths.
Turn brand label headers into questions or labels people can understand out of context.
Name faculty, labs, centers, student work, grants, partners, and outcomes.
The more clearly the page names fields, centers, people, methods, and partners, the easier it is to understand and cite.
Crafting a research page
Answer with named departments, flagship areas, and centers.
Say yes or no, then name the mechanism: faculty projects, labs, and think[box].
List two or three centers and what each studies.
Explain the partnership path and who to contact.
Each answer is direct, specific, and easy to cite.
Example page: case.edu/engineering/research
Where real FAQs come from
Use current question patterns around program and school terms.
Performance > Queries shows the language visitors already use.
Semrush, AlsoAsked, and Answer the Public can expand question sets.
Prompt checks show what AI systems ask for, cite, or miss.
Admissions, advising, faculty, and advancement know the recurring questions.
Use the visitor's wording, then answer in two or three plain sentences.
Giving pages: make the action and impact clear
Start with what they can do, not only why giving matters.
Include donate, give, bequest, donor advised fund, IRA rollover, and charitable gift annuity where relevant.
Give each method enough context for donor confidence.
Turn "Online" into "Give Online" and "By mail" into "Give by Mail."
Use impact figures, donor quotes, planned giving guidance, and visible Give Now paths.
Make Give Now, contact, and method specific paths easy to find.
Crafting a giving page
Online
By mail
By phone
Strategic Giving text is broad and hard to scan.
Under "How to Donate to Case Western Reserve": Give Online, Give by Mail, Give by Phone.
"Plan a bequest, charitable gift annuity, IRA rollover, or donor advised fund gift that supports Case Western Reserve while meeting your financial goals."
Combine transaction clarity with donor confidence. Put Give Now above the fold where possible.
Example page: case.edu/give/ways-give
News articles: make authority claims portable
Use Case Western Reserve University near the top, with CWRU as supporting abbreviation.
Write the core claim with institution, ranking, source, and date context.
End with an About Case Western Reserve paragraph that can travel with excerpts.
Pursue mentions on trusted sites so the claim is corroborated outside CWRU.
News, PR, program pages, school pages, and external coverage all teach AI systems what the university is known for.
Crafting a news article
CWRU now #1 fastest growing research university in AAU
Case Western Reserve University is the fastest growing research university in the Association of American Universities
Why it works: the headline and first line can stand alone when excerpted or cited.
Case Western Reserve University is a private research university in Cleveland, Ohio, known for research strength across medicine, engineering, and the sciences.
Example page: case.edu/news/cwru-now-1-fastest-growing-research-university-aau
How to turn the review into action
Fix duplicate titles, first sentences, section headers, and visible next step language.
Add page type rules for fact boxes, FAQs, boilerplate, proof, and dated claims.
Separate content owner edits from design, CMS, policy, and approval dependencies.
Sort candidate changes by impact, effort, owner, and dependency so the team leaves with practical next steps.
Priority workshop and next steps
Turn examples into standards CWRU can carry forward
Priority workshop board
Use this after the worksheet decisions are named: sort the team's action backlog by impact, effort, owner, and dependency.
Quick wins
Rewrite vague H2s into reader questions.
Replace repeated "learn more" links.
Add page job statements before editing.
Standardize
Program/school/entity boilerplate.
Fact boxes, FAQs, proof, and dated claims.
Rules for alt text and CTA language.
Governance
Who owns program boilerplate?
What needs brand, legal, or accessibility review?
What needs CMS or design work?
Leave alone
Do not turn every page into an AI page.
Do not chase every prompt variation.
Do not hide the human reader behind machine optimization.
Final exercise: fix, standardize, leave alone
Use one CWRU page. Capture page-specific edits, reusable standards, and items to hold for later so the next step is clear without a presenter.
Fix first
Page-specific fixes for this page.Use when this page or section can be improved now with a content edit.
The page, section, heading, CTA, table, image, or copy block.
Name the reader, accessibility, search, or AI search impact.
Who makes the change or moves it to the right person?
Standardize
A reusable rule applied everywhere.Test: every time CWRU says this, the team means it the same way.
Write the standard, not just the example from this page.
All program pages, news pages, blog pages, school pages, or another set.
Owned by CWRU: note who approves the standard before rollout.
Leave alone
Hold items that should not change right now.Use for future ideas, blocked fixes, and questions without an answer yet.
Low impact, low confidence, or not worth the tradeoff.
Good idea, but not solvable by content edits alone.
No clear answer yet, so hold it until ownership or policy is decided.
Recommendation: keep this as the single-page worksheet. Keep the priority workshop board as the team backlog that comes after it.
Participant takeaway
Use one framework first
Before rewriting, diagnose the page. The framework keeps copy, UX, accessibility, SEO, and AI search decisions connected.
Carry these rules forward
Thank you
Web Writing + AI Search Training
Search Influence
June 9-10, 2026

